A picornavirus[a] is a virus belonging to the familyPicornaviridae, a family of viruses in the order Picornavirales. Vertebrates, including humans, serve as natural hosts. Picornaviruses are nonenveloped viruses that represent a large family of small, cytoplasmic, plus-strand RNA(~7.5kb) viruses with a 30 nm icosahedral capsid. Its genome does not have a lipid membrane. Picornaviruses are found in mammals and birds. There are currently 80 species in this family, divided among 35 genera. These include the Enterovirus, Aphthovirus, Cardiovirus, Rhinovirus and Hepatovirus genera. The viruses in this family can cause a range of diseases including paralysis, meningitis, hepatitis and poliomyelitis. Picornaviruses are in Baltimore IV class. Their genome single-stranded (+) sense RNA is that functions as mRNA after entry into the cell and all viral mRNA synthesized is of genome polarity. The mRNA encodes RNA dependent RNA polymerase. This polymerase makes complementary minus strands of RNA, then uses them as templates to make more plus strands. So, an overview of the steps in picornavirus replication are in order: attachment, entry, translation, transcription/genome replication (one and the same process), assembly and exit.
Enteroviruses infect the enteric tract, which is reflected in their name. On the other hand, rhinoviruses infect primarily the nose and the throat. Enteroviruses replicate at 37 °C, whereas rhinoviruses grow better at 33 °C, as this is the lower temperature of the nose. Enteroviruses are stable under acid conditions and thus they are able to survive exposure to gastric acid. In contrast, rhinoviruses are acid-labile (inactivated or destroyed by low pH conditions) and that is the reason why rhinovirus infections are restricted to the nose and throat.
|Genus||Species (* signifies type species)||Serotypes|
|Aphthovirus||Bovine rhinitis A virus||2 types: bovine rhinitis A virus (BRAV) 1–2 (formerly bovine rhinovirus 1 & 3)|
|Bovine rhinitis B virus||1 type: bovine rhinitis B virus (BRBV) 1 (formerly bovine rhinovirus 2)|
|Equine rhinitis A virus||1 type: equine rhinitis A virus (ERAV) 1 (formerly equine rhinovirus 1)|
|Foot-and-mouth disease virus *||7 types: O, A, C, Southern African Territories (SAT) 1, SAT 2, SAT 3 and Asia 1|
|Aquamavirus||Aquamavirus A||1 type: seal aquamavirus A1 (SeAV-A1)|
|Avihepatovirus||Duck hepatitis A virus||3 types: duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV) 1–3|
|Cardiovirus||Encephalomyocarditis virus *||2 types: encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) 1 & EMCV-2. Note: Columbia SK virus, Maus Elberfeld virus and Mengovirus are strains of EMCV-1.|
|Theilovirus||12 types: Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV), Vilyuisk human encephalomyelitis virus (VHEV), Thera virus (TRV), Saffold virus (SAFV) 1–9|
|Cosavirus||Cosavirus A||24 types: cosavirus A1 (CoSV-A1) to CoSV-A24|
|Dicipivirus||Cadicivirus A||1 type: canine picodicistrovirus 1 (CaPdV-1)|
|Enterovirus||Enterovirus A (formerly Human enterovirus A)||23 types: coxsackievirus A2 (CV-A2), CV-A3, CV-A4, CV-A5, CV-A6, CV-A7, CV-A8, CV-A10, CV-A12, CV-A14, CV-A16, enterovirus (EV) A71, EV-A76, EV-A89, EV-A90, EV-A91, EV-A92, EV-114, EV-A119, SV19, SV43, SV46 & BA13; see also coxsackie A virus|
|Enterovirus B (formerly Human enterovirus B)||60 types: coxsackievirus B1 (CV-B1), CV-B2, CV-B3, CV-B4, CV-B5 (incl. swine vesicular disease virus [SVDV]), CV-B6, CV-A9, echovirus 1 (E-1; incl. E-8), E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6, E-7, E-9 (incl. CV-A23), E-11, E-12, E-13, E-14, E-15, E-16, E-17, E-18, E-19, E-20, E-21, E-24, E-25, E-26, E-27, E-29, E-30, E-31, E-32, E-33, enterovirus B69 (EV-B69), EV-B73, EV-B74, EV-B75, EV-B77, EV-B78, EV-B79, EV-B80, EV-B81, EV-B82, EV-B83, EV-B84, EV-B85, EV-B86, EV-B87, EV-B88, EV-B93, EV-B97, EV-B98, EV-B100, EV-B101, EV-B106, EV-B107, EV-B110 & SA5; see also coxsackie B virus and echovirus|
|Enterovirus C * (formerly Human enterovirus C)||23 types: poliovirus (PV) 1, PV-2, PV-3, coxsackievirus A1 (CV-A1), CV-A11, CV-A13, CV-A17, CV-A19, CV-A20, CV-A21, CV-A22, CV-A24, EV-C95, EV-C96, EV-C99, EV-C102, EV-C104, EV-C105, EV-C109, EV-C113, EV-C116, EV-C117 & EV-118|
|Enterovirus D (formerly Human enterovirus D)||5 types: enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), EV-D70, EV-D94, EV-D111 & EV-D120|
|Enterovirus E (formerly Bovine enterovirus group A)||4 types (proposed): enterovirus E1 (EV-E1), EV-E2, EV-E3 & EV-E4|
|Enterovirus F (formerly Bovine enterovirus group B)||6 types (proposed): enterovirus F1 (EV-F1), EV-F2, EV-F3, EV-F4, EV-F5 & EV-E6|
|Enterovirus G (formerly Porcine enterovirus B)||6 types: enterovirus (EV) G1 to G6 (formerly porcine enterovirus 9–10, 14–16 and ovine enterovirus 1)|
|Enterovirus H (formerly Simian enterovirus A)||1 type: enterovirus H1 (EV-H1)|
|Enterovirus J||6 types: simian virus 6 (SV6), enterovirus J103 (EV-J103), EV-J108, EV-J112, EV-J115 and EV-J121|
|Rhinovirus A (formerly Human rhinovirus A)||77 types: human rhinovirus (HRV) A1, A2, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11, A12, A13, A15, A16, A18, A19, A20, A21, A22, A23, A24, A25, A28, A29, A30, A31, A32, A33, A34, A36, A38, A39, A40, A41, A43, A44, A45, A46, A47, A49, A50, A51, A53, A54, A55, A56, A57, A58, A59, A60, A61, A62, A63, A64, A65, A66, A67, A68, A71, A73, A74, A75, A76, A77, A78, A80, A81, A82, A85, A88, A89, A90, A94, A95, A96, A98, A100, A101, A102 and A103|
|Rhinovirus B (formerly Human rhinovirus B)||25 types: human rhinovirus (HRV) B3, B4, B5, B6, B14, B17, B26, B27, B35, B37, B42, B48, B52, B69, B70, B72, B79, B83, B84, B86, B91, B92, B93, B97 and B99|
|Rhinovirus C (formerly Human rhinovirus C)||51 types: human rhinovirus (HRV) C1–C51|
|Erbovirus||Equine rhinitis B virus *||3 types: equine rhinitis B virus (ERBV) 1–3 (formerly equine rhinovirus 2, 3 and acid-stable equine picornavirus)|
|Hepatovirus||Hepatitis A virus *||1 type: hepatitis A virus (HAV) 1|
|Kobuvirus||Aichivirus A * (formerly Aichi virus)||3 types: Aichi virus (AiV) 1, canine kobuvirus 1 (CaKV-1) & murine kobuvirus 1 (MuKV-1)|
|Aichivirus B (formerly Bovine kobuvirus)||2 types: bovine kobuvirus (BKV) 1 & ovine kobuvirus 1 (OKV-1)|
|Aichivirus C||1 type: porcine kobuvirus 1 (PKV-1)|
|Megrivirus||Melegrivirus A *||1 type: turkey hepatitis virus (THV) 1|
|Parechovirus||Human parechovirus *||14 types: human parechovirus (HPeV) 1-14|
|Ljungan virus||4 types: Ljungan virus (LV) 1–4|
|Piscevirus||Fathead minnow picornavirus||1 type: Fathead minnow picornavirus|
|Salivirus||Salivirus A||1 type: salivirus A1|
|Sapelovirus||Porcine sapelovirus * (formerly Porcine enterovirus A)||1 type: porcine sapelovirus (PSV) 1 (formerly PEV-8)|
|Simian sapelovirus||3 types: simian sapleovirus (SSV) 1–3|
|Avian sapelovirus||1 type: avian sapelovirus (ASV) 1|
|Senecavirus||Seneca Valley virus *||1 type: Seneca Valley virus (SVV) 1|
|Teschovirus||Porcine teschovirus *||13 types: porcine teschovirus (PTV) 1 to 13|
|Tremovirus||Avian encephalomyelitis virus||1 type: avian encephalomyelitis virus (AEV) 1|
Picornaviruses are non-enveloped, with an icosahedralcapsid. The capsid is an arrangement of 60 protomers in a tightly packed icosahedral structure. Each protomer consists of 4 polypeptides known as VP (viral protein) 1, 2, 3 and 4. VP2 and VP4 polypeptides originate from one protomer known as VP0 that is cleaved to give the different capsid components. The icosahedral is said to have a triangulation number of 3, this means that in the icosahedral structure each of the 60 triangles that make up the capsid are split into 3 little triangles with a subunit on the corner.In many picornaviruses have a deep cleft formed by around each of the 12 vertices of icosahedrons.The outer surface of the capsid is composed of regions of VP1, VP2 and VP3. Around each of the vertices is a canyon lined with the C termini of VP1 and VP3. The interior surface of the capsid is composed of VP4 and the N termini of VP1. J.Esposito and Professor Freederick A. Murphy demonstrates cleft structure referred to as canyons, using X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy. Depending on the type and degree of dehydration the viral particle is around 27–30 nm in diameter. The viral genome is around 2500 nm in length so we can therefore conclude that it must be tightly packaged within the capsid along with substances such as sodium ions in order to cancel out the negative charges on the RNA caused by the phosphate groups.
|Genus||Structure||Symmetry||Capsid||Genomic arrangement||Genomic segmentation|
Picornaviruses are classed under Baltimore's viral classification system as group IV viruses as they contain a single stranded, positive sense RNA genome. Their genome ranges between 7.1 and 8.9 kb (kilobases) in length. Like most positive sense RNA genomes, the genetic material alone is infectious; although substantially less virulent than if contained within the viral particle, the RNA can have increased infectivity when transfected into cells. The genomeRNA is unusual because it has a protein on the 5' end that is used as a primer for transcription by RNA polymerase.This primer is called VPg genome range between 2–3 kb. VPg contain tyrosine residue at the 3’ end. Tyrosine as a –OH source for covalently linked to 5’ end of RNA.
The genome is non-segmented and positive-sense (the same sense as mammalian mRNA, being read 5' to 3'). Unlike mammalianmRNA picornaviruses do not have a 5' cap but a virally encoded protein known as VPg. However, like mammalian mRNA, the genome does have a poly(A) tail at the 3' end. There is an un-translated region (UTR) at both ends of the picornavirus genome. The 5' UTR is usually longer, being around 500–1200 nucleotides (nt) in length, compared to that of the 3' UTR, which is around 30–650 nt. It is thought that the 5' UTR is important in translation and the 3' in negative strand synthesis; however the 5' end may also have a role to play in virulence of the virus. The rest of the genome encodes structural proteins at the 5' end and non-structural proteins at the 3' end in a single polyprotein.
The polyprotein is organised as follows: L-1ABCD-2ABC-3ABCD with each letter representing a protein, however, there are variations to this layout.
The 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D proteins are the capsid proteins VP4, VP2, VP3, and VP1, respectively.Virus-coded proteases perform the cleavages, some of which are intramolecular. The polyprotein is first cut to yield P1, P2 and P3. P1 becomes myristylated at the N terminus before being cleaved to VP0, VP3 and VP1, the proteins that will form procapsids; VP0 will later be cleaved to produce VP2 and VP4. Other cleavage products include 3B (VPg), 2C (an ATPase) and 3D (the RNA polymerase).
Genomic RNAs of picornaviruses possess multiple RNA elements and they are required for both negative and plus strand RNA synthesis. The cis acting replication(cre) element is required for replication. The stem-loop-structure that contains the cre is independent of position but changes with location between virus types when it has been identified. Also, the 3’ end elements of viral RNA are significant and efficient for RNA replication of picornaviruses. The 3’ end of picornavirus contains poly(A) tract which be required for infectivity. On the other hand, RNA synthesis is hypothesized to occur in this region.3’ end NCR of poliovirus is not necessary for negative-strands synthesis. However, it is important element for positive—strand synthesis. Additionally,5’ end NCR that contain secondary structural elements is required for RNA replication and poliovirus translation initiation(IRES). Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES) are RNA structures that allow cap independent initiation of translation, and are able to initiate translation in the middle of a messenger RNA.
The viral particle binds to cell surface receptors. Cell surface receptors are characterized for each serotype of picornaviruses. For example, poliovirus receptor is glycoprotein CD155 which is special receptor for human and some other primate species. For this reason, poliovirus couldn’t be made in many laboratories until transgenic mice having a CD155 receptor on their cell surface were developed in the 1990s. These animals can be infected and used for studies of replication and pathogenesis. Binding causes a conformational change in the viral capsid proteins, and myristic acid are released. These acids form a pore in the cell membrane through which RNA is injected . Once inside the cell, the RNA un-coats and the (+) strand RNA genome is replicated through a double-stranded RNA intermediate that is formed using viral RDRP (RNA-Dependent RNA polymerase). Translation by host cell ribosomes is not initiated by a 5' G cap as usual, but rather is initiated by an IRES (Internal Ribosome Entry Site). The viral lifecycle is very rapid with the whole process of replication being completed on average within 8 hours. However, as little as 30 minutes after initial infection, cell protein synthesis declines to almost zero output – essentially the macromolecular synthesis of cell proteins is shut off. Over the next 1–2 hours there is a loss of margination of chromatin and homogeneity in the nucleus, before the viral proteins start to be synthesized and a vacuole appears in the cytoplasm close to the nucleus that gradually starts to spread as the time after infection reaches around 3 hours. After this time the cell plasma membrane becomes permeable, at 4–6 hours the virus particles assemble, and can sometimes be seen in the cytoplasm. At around 8 hours the cell is effectively dead and lyses to release the viral particles.
Experimental data from single step growth-curve-like experiments have allowed scientists to look at the replication of the picornaviruses in great detail. The whole of replication occurs within the host cell cytoplasm and infection can even happen in cells that do not contain a nucleus (known as enucleated cells) and those treated with actinomycin D (this antibiotic would inhibit viral replication if this occurred in the nucleus.)
Translation takes place by -1 ribosomal frameshifting, viral initiation, and ribosomal skipping. The virus exits the host cell by lysis, and viroporins. Vertebrates serve as the natural host. Transmission routes are fecal-oral, contact, ingestion, and air borne particles.
|Genus||Host details||Tissue tropism||Entry details||Release details||Replication site||Assembly site||Transmission|
|Aphthovirus||Ruminants (i.e. cattle, bison, sheep), Horses||Epithelium: soft palate; epithelium: pharynx; epithelium: lung; epithelium: feet; epithelium: mouth||Clathrin-mediated endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Contact; saliva; aerosol|
|Cardiovirus||Humans; vertebrates||Gastrointestinal tract; CNS; heart||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Zoonosis; fomite|
|Cosavirus||Human||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Unknown||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Dicipivirus||Dog||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Unknown||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Enterovirus||Humans; mammals||Gastrointestinal tract||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Oral-fecal|
|Erbovirus||Horse||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Contact|
|Gallivirus||Turkey, chicken||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Hepatovirus||Humans; vertebrates||Liver||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Oral-fecal; blood|
|Hunnivirus||Cattle||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Kobuvirus||Humans||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Oral-fecal; blood|
|Kunsagivirus||Unknown||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Megrivirus||Unknown||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Mischivirus||Unknown||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Mosavirus||Unknown||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Oscivirus||Unknown||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Parechovirus||Humans||Respiratory tract; gastrointestinal tract||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Pasivirus||Pigs||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Passerivirus||Birds||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Rosavirus||Human, rodents||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Sakobuvirus||Unknown||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Salivirus||Human, chimpanzee||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Sapelovirus||Birds||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Senecavirus||Pigs, Cow||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Sicinivirus||Unknown||None||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Unknown|
|Teschovirus||Swine||Gastrointestinal tract; CNS||Cell receptor endocytosis||Lysis||Cytoplasm||Cytoplasm||Oral-fecal|
Picornaviruses have a viral protein (VPg) covalently linked to 5’ end of their genomes instead of 7-methylguanosine cap like cellular mRNAs. Virus RNA polymerases use VPg as primer. VPg as primer uses both minus and plus strand RNA synthesis. Picornavirus replication is initiated by the uridylylation of viral protein genome-linked (VPg).It is uridylylated at the hydroxyl group of a tyrosine residue. A VPg primer mechanism is utilized by the picornavirus (entero- aphtho- and others), additional virus groups (poty-, como-, calici- and others) and picornavirus-like (coronavirus, notavirus, etc.) supergroup of RNA viruses. The mechanism has been best studied for the enteroviruses (which include many human pathogens, such as poliovirus and coxsackie viruses) as well as for the aphthovirus, an animal pathogen causing foot and mouth disease (FMDV).
In this group, primer-dependent RNA synthesis utilizes a small 22–25 amino acid long viral protein linked to the genome (VPg) to initiate polymerase activity, where the primer is covalently bound to the 5’ end of the RNA template. The uridylylation occurs at a tyrosine residue at the third position of the VPg. A cis-acting replication element (CRE), which is a RNA stem loop structure, serves as a template for the uridylylation of VPg, resulting in the synthesis of VPgpUpUOH. Mutations within the CRE-RNA structure prevent VPg uridylylation, and mutations within the VPg sequence can severely diminish RdRp catalytic activity. While the tyrosine hydroxyl of VPg can prime negative-strand RNA synthesis in a CRE- and VPgpUpUOH-independent manner, CRE-dependent VPgpUpUOH synthesis is absolutely required for positive-strand RNA synthesis. CRE-dependent VPg uridylylation lowers the Km¬ of UTP required for viral RNA replication and CRE-dependent VPgpUpUOH synthesis, and is required for efficient negative-strand RNA synthesis, especially when UTP concentrations are limiting. The VPgpUpUOH primer is transferred to the 3’ end of the RNA template for elongation, which can continue by addition of nucleotide bases by RdRp. Partial crystal structures for VPgs of foot and mouth disease virus and coxsackie virus B3 suggest that there may be two sites on the viral polymerase for the small VPgs of the picornaviruses. NMR solution structures of poliovirus VPg and VPgpU show that uridylylation stabilizes the structure of the VPg, which is otherwise quite flexible in solution. The second site may be used for uridylylation, after which the VPgpU can initiate RNA synthesis. It should be noted that the VPg primers of caliciviruses, whose structures are only beginning to be revealed, are much larger than those of the picornaviruses. Mechanisms for uridylylation and priming may be quite different in all of these groups.
VPg uridylylation may include the use of precursor proteins, allowing for the determination of a possible mechanism for the location of the diuridylylated, VPg-containing precursor at the 3’ end of plus- or minus-strand RNA for production of full-length RNA. Determinants of VPg uridylylation efficiency suggest formation and/or collapse or release of the uridylylated product as the rate-limiting step in vitro depending upon the VPg donor employed. Precursor proteins also have an effect on VPg-CRE specificity and stability. The upper RNA stem loop, to which VPg binds, has a significant impact on both retention, and recruitment, of VPg and Pol. The stem loop of CRE will partially unwind, allowing the precursor components to bind and recruit VPg and Pol4. The CRE loop has a defined consensus sequence to which the initiation components bind, however; there is no consensus sequence for the supporting stem, which suggests that only the structural stability of the CRE is important.
Assembly and organization of the picornavirus VPg ribonucleoprotein complex.
- Step 1: Two 3CD (VPg complex) molecules bind to CRE with the 3C domains (VPg domain) contacting the upper stem and the 3D domains (VPg domain) contacting the lower stem.
- Step 2: The 3C dimer opens the RNA stem by forming a more stable interaction with single strands forming the stem.
- Step 3: 3Dpol is recruited to and retained in this complex by a physical interaction between the back of the thumb subdomain of 3Dpol and a surface of one or both 3C subdomains of 3CD.
VPg may also play an important role in specific recognition of viral genome by movement protein (MP). Movement proteins are non-structural proteins encoded by many, if not all, plant viruses to enable their movement from one infected cell to neighboring cells. MP and VPg interact to provide specificity for the transport of viral RNA from cell to cell. To fulfill energy requirements, MP also interacts with P10, which is a cellular ATPase.
The first animal virus discovered (1897) was the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). It is the prototypic member of the Aphthovirus genus in the Picornaviridae family. The plaque assay was developed using poliovirus; the discovery of viral replication in culture was also with poliovirus in 1949. This was the first time that infection virus had been produced from molecular building blocks in the cells.Polyprotein synthesis, internal ribosome entry sites, and uncappedmRNA were all discovered by studying poliovirus infected cells, and a poliovirus clone was the first infectious DNA clone made of an RNA virus in animals. Along with rhinovirus, poliovirus was the first animal virus to have its structure determined by x-ray crystallography. RNA dependent RNA polymerase was discovered in Mengovirus, a genus of picornaviruses.
Within the order Picornavirales, there are related viral families, such as the plant infecting Secoviridae, and the insect infecting Dicistroviridae.
The plant-infecting picorna-like viruses have a number of properties that are distinct from the animal viruses.The picornaviruses include the plant-infecting Secovirida. It has both icosahedral virus particles, viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and protease and viral replication proteins. But they have distinguished properties at the same time. For example, secoviruses infect plants and it has specialized proteins. The effect of secoviruses is important on cultivated crops. It infected a wide range of plants from grapevine to rice. They have been classified into the family Secoviridae containing the subfamily Comovirinae (genera Comovirus, Fabavirus and Nepovirus), and genera Sequivirus, Waikavirus, Cheravirus, Sadwavirus, and Torradovirus (type species Tomato torrado virus)).
Members of the family dicistroviruses are to beneficial invertebrates such as honey bees and shrimp and to insect pests of medical and agricultural importance that share features with animal and human viruses of the family. Picornaviridae and other insect or marine viruses of the order Picornavirales. Its genome is linear, single stranded positive sense RNA with a viral genome-linked protein (VPg) covalently linked at the 5’ end and a 3’ poly (A) tract as picornaviruses. Plautia stali intestine virus kelp fly virus, Ectropis obliqua picorna-like virus, deformed wing virus, acute bee paralysis virus, Drosophila C virus, Rhopalosiphum padi virus, and Himetobi P virus. Several have been placed in a separate family—the Dicistroviridae. Others have been placed into a new family Iflaviridae. This family includes Infectious flacherie virus and SeIV-1 virus. Another virus is Nora virus from Drosophila melanogaster. This latter virus awaits further classification.
- ^ abc"ICTV Report Picornaviridae".
- ^ abcRyu, W.S, 2016, Molecular Virology of Human Pathogenic Viruses, Academic Press, Korea, Page 153-164
- ^ abcd"Viral Zone". ExPASy. Retrieved 15 June 2015.
- ^ abICTV. "Virus Taxonomy: 2014 Release". Retrieved 15 June 2015.
- ^Mettenleiter TC and Sobrino F (editors). (2008). Animal Viruses: Molecular Biology. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-22-6. .
- ^Lau SK, Woo PC, Lai KK, Huang Y, Yip CC, Shek CT, Lee P, Lam CS, Chan KH, Yuen KY (2011) Complete genome analysis of three novel picornaviruses from diverse bat species. J Virol.
- ^Carter, J., & Saunders, V. A. (2007). Virology: principles and applications. John Wiley & Sons
- ^ abMartinez-Salas; et al. (2008). "Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus". Animal Viruses: Molecular Biology. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-22-6.
- ^ abcdeJohn B. Carter; Venetia A. Saunders (2007). Virology: Principles and applications. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 160–165.
- ^Zabel, P., Moerman, M., Lomonossoff, G., Shanks, M., & Beyreuther, K. (1984). Cowpea mosaic virus VPg: sequencing of radiochemically modified protein allows mapping of the gene on B RNA. The EMBO Journal, 3(7), 1629–1634. PMC557569
- ^Acheson, Nicholas H (2011). Fundamentals of Molecular Virology,2e. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0470900598
- ^Daijogo, S., & Semler, B. L. (2011). 1 Mechanistic Intersections Between Picornavirus Translation and RNA Replication. Advances in virus research, 80, 1.
- ^Flanegan, JB; Baltimore, D (September 1977). "Poliovirus-specific primer-dependent RNA polymerase able to copy poly(A)". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74 (9): 3677–80. Bibcode:1977PNAS...74.3677F. doi:10.1073/pnas.74.9.3677. PMC 431685. PMID 198796.
- ^Ambros V, Baltimore D (August 1978). "Protein is linked to the 5' end of poliovirus RNA by a phosphodiester linkage to tyrosine". J. Biol. Chem. 253 (15): 5263–6. PMID 209034.
- ^Gu C, Zeng T, Li Y, Xu Z, Mo Z, Zheng C (October 2009). "Structure-function analysis of mutant RNA-dependent RNA polymerase complexes with VPg". Biochemistry Mosc. 74 (10): 1132–41. doi:10.1134/S0006297909100095. PMID 19916926.
- ^Steil BP, Barton DJ (October 2008). "Poliovirus cis-Acting Replication Element-Dependent VPg Uridylylation Lowers the Km of the Initiating Nucleoside Triphosphate for Viral RNA Replication". J. Virol. 82 (19): 9400–8. doi:10.1128/JVI.00427-08. PMC 2546976. PMID 18653453.
- ^Ferrer-Orta C, Arias A, Agudo R, Pérez-Luque R, Escarmís C, Domingo E, Verdaguer N (February 2006). "The structure of a protein primer-polymerase complex in the initiation of genome replication". EMBO J. 25 (4): 880–8. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600971. PMC 1383552. PMID 16456546.
- ^Gruez A, Selisko B, Roberts M, Bricogne G, Bussetta C, Jabafi I, Coutard B, De Palma AM, Neyts J, Canard B (October 2008).
- ^Etymology - portmanteau of pico (small) RNA virus.
Department of Medicinal and Toxicological Chemistry, University of Sassari, Via Muroni 23/a, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Copyright © 2011 Irene Briguglio et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Many viral pathogens encode the motor proteins named RNA helicases which display various functions in genome replication. General strategies to design specific and selective drugs targeting helicase for the treatment of viral infections could act via one or more of the following mechanisms: inhibition of the NTPase activity, by interferences with ATP binding and therefore by limiting the energy required for the unwinding and translocation, or by allosteric mechanism and therefore by stabilizing the conformation of the enzyme in low helicase activity state; inhibition of nucleic acids binding to the helicase; inhibition of coupling of ATP hydrolysis to unwinding; inhibition of unwinding by sterically blocking helicase translocation. Recently, by in vitro screening studies, it has been reported that several benzotriazole, imidazole, imidazodiazepine, phenothiazine, quinoline, anthracycline, triphenylmethane, tropolone, pyrrole, acridone, small peptide, and Bananin derivatives are endowed with helicase inhibition of pathogen viruses belonging to Flaviviridae, Coronaviridae, and Picornaviridae families.
To convert a closed double-stranded DNA or RNA helix into two open single strands, so that other protein machinery can manipulate the polynucleotides, the cells require helicases. They are motor proteins that use energy derived from ATP hydrolysis [1–4]. Several DNA and RNA helicases have been isolated from all kingdoms of life, from virus to man [5–8]. Detailed structural information, biological mechanisms, and clear outlook on inhibitors of therapeutic relevance as antiviral agents are recently provided by Xi et al. , Kwong et al. , and overall Frick et al. [11, 12].
Several ssRNA+ (positive sense single-stranded RNA) helicases have been studied in detail including those from Dengue fever virus (DFV), West Nile virus (WNV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV). More in general, a recent article on anti-Flaviviridae chemotherapy has been published by Ghosh and Basu , who expand the original information regarding the role of helicases in Flaviviridae previously reported by Borowski .
This enzyme is a promising target to develop new therapies and preventative agents, since ssRNA+ viruses belonging to families like Flaviviridae, Coronaviridae, and Picornaviridae cause clinically significant diseases both in humans and animals, determining life lost, economical loss, and higher productivity costs. Examples are the bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), a serious welfare problem that significantly damages the farm business, and the Hepatitis C virus [HCV], that is now a global public health issue, being a major cause of human hepatitis . Actually, with the exception of YFV, no vaccine exists against the various Flaviviridae members therefore, new therapies and preventative agents are strongly needed.
Viruses belonging to Picornaviridae family cause a variety of illnesses, including meningitis, cold, heart infection, conjunctivitis, and hepatitis . This family includes nine genera, some of which comprise major human pathogens, namely, Enterovirus (including Poliovirus, Coxsackievirus, Echovirus), Rhinovirus (approximately 105 serotypes), and Hepatovirus (Hepatitis A virus). At present, no specific antiviral therapy is available for the treatment of Picornaviridae infections.
Finally, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV), an enveloped virus, has recently infected thousand of humans, with about 800 deaths, and no vaccine or specific antiviral therapy is known against this virus.
No retroviruses or ssRNA- viruses have been reported to encode the synthesis of a helicase; they might simply utilize helicases encoded by the host cell instead of their own proteins, as recently shown for HIV replication, which requires the human DDX3 DEAD-box RNA helicase [17, 18].
In ssRNA+ viruses, the RNA helicases are implicated in several functions including RNA genome replication, ribosome biogenesis, messengers RNA transcription, pre-mRNA splicing, RNA maturation, RNA export and degradation, as well as RNA translation [19, 20].
Basing on certain signature motifs in the amino acid sequence, Gorbalenya and Koonin have shown that all helicases can be classified in several genetic families . All but two of the helicase families can be grouped into one of three larger “superfamilies,” designed as superfamily 1 (SF1), superfamily 2 (SF2) , and superfamily 3 (SF3) .
Of the remaining 2 families, one is similar to the DnaB helicase of E. coli  and the other resembles the E. coli Rho helicase that is used in transcriptional termination . Only the DnaB-like family, sometimes called family 4 (F4) or superfamily 4 (SF4), contains viral proteins .
All helicases bind NTP using two structurally common amino acidic sequences named motif I and motif II, described by Walker et al.  and Subramanya et al. . Motif I (also known as Walker A motif/boxes A) is a phosphate-binding P-loop that also interact with the ribose, while motif II (also known as Walker B/boxes B) is a Mg2+ co-factor binding loop. The ATP-binding site of helicase is completed by an arginine “finger” and a catalytic base, which accepts a proton from the attacking water molecule. In related proteins, this catalytic base has been demonstrated to be a conserved glutamate near the Walker B motif [27, 28]. Arginine amino acids often interact with the beta and gamma phosphates of the bound ATP, stabilizing the transition state [29, 30], Figure 1.
Figure 1: Mechanism of helicase-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis. Helicases coordinate an ATP, Mg2+ and a water molecule using a conserved Lys and Asp in the Walker A and B motifs on one RecA-like domain and an Arg on an adjacent RecA-like domain. A Glu likely acts as a catalytic base by accepting a proton from the attacking water molecule .
All helicases can also be classified according to their movement relative to the nucleic acid strand to which they are primarily associated or to their quaternary structures.
Thus, a helicase can be classified basing on each of the three above schemes. For example, the helicase encoded by HCV (Hepatitis C Virus) is an SF2, nonring, 3′–5′ RNA helicase. Human papillomavirus helicase is an SF3, ring, 3′–5′ DNA helicase.
The functional importance of helicases means that inhibitors or modulators for these enzymes are potentially important as therapeutic agents. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in the development of highly selective inhibitors as antiviral and anticancer drugs for clinical uses. Developing nontoxic helicase inhibitors as antiviral drugs is considerably more difficult than developing drugs designed to inhibit other viral enzymes. In fact, in contrast with proteases and polymerases, the helicases-dependent reactions are still not fully elucidated. Furthermore, the helicase ATP-binding site is conserved not only in all the classes of helicases, but also in other proteins necessary for the cellular lifecycle, such as small GTPases, kinases, the AAA+ family (ATPases associated with various cellular activities), and even the mitochondrial ATP synthase (F1 ATPase). Thus, compounds that inhibit helicases via their ATP-binding sites could have toxic effects on the host cells.
2. Viral RNA Helicases As Antiviral Drug Targets
Many viral pathogens encode RNA helicases which have been demonstrated essential for viral replication and pathogenesis [31–33]. Between them are(i)emerging or re-emerging viruses with pandemic potential, such as SARS-Cov (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus), Dengue, West Nile, and Japanese encephalitis viruses,(ii)viruses that have a stable spread worldwide, such as HCV (Hepatitis C Virus),(iii)viruses that do not have a large spread, but can generate serious health problems because of lack or limited availability of effective drugs, such as CVB (Human Coxsackie B Virus).
General strategies to design specific and selective drugs for the treatment of viral infections targeting helicase could act via one or more of the following mechanisms: (1)inhibition of the NTPase activity by interferences with ATP binding and therefore by limiting the energy required for the unwinding and translocation, (2)inhibition of the NTPase activity by allosteric mechanism and therefore by stabilizing the conformation of the enzyme in low helicase activity state, (3)inhibition of nucleic acids binding to the helicase,(4)inhibition of coupling of ATP hydrolysis to unwinding,(5)inhibition of unwinding by sterically blocking helicase translocation,(6)development of small molecule antagonists against essential protein-protein interactions involving helicases.
Some characteristics of helicase families of pathogen viruses belonging to Flaviviridae, Coronaviridae, and Picornaviridae families are reported in Table 1 [9, 10, 34].
Table 1: Viral helicases of same ssRNA+ Viruses (belonging to Flaviviridae, Coronaviridae, and Picornaviridae families) [9, 10, 33].
The Flaviviridae is a large family of related positive-strand RNA viruses that currently consists of three genera: Flavivirus, Pestivirus (from the Latin pestis, plague), and Hepacivirus (from the Greek hepatos, liver). In addition, the family includes two groups of viruses, GBV-A and GBV-C, that are currently unassigned to a specific genus and await formal classification . Within this family are comprised viruses that cause significant diseases in human and animal populations. From Flavivirus genus is Dengue virus (DENV) with its associated dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), West Nile virus (WNV), Yellow Fever virus (YFV), and tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). The Pestiviruses are animal pathogens of major economic importance for the livestock industry, like bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), border disease virus (BDV) of sheep, and classical swine fever virus (CSFV). The Hepacivirus genus includes only the hepatitis C virus (HCV), an important human pathogen.
HCV, identified in 1989 , is a major cause of human hepatitis, globally, and infects about 3% of the world’s population . Hepacivirus is spread primarily by direct contact with human blood; hence, the major causes of infection are use of unscreened blood transfusions and reuse of needles and syringes that have not been adequately sterilised. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over 170 million people worldwide are presently infected with this virus . Most infections become persistent and about 60% of cases progress towards chronic liver disease, that can lead to development of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure [39, 40].
Pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin is used in the clinic for hepatitis due to HCV. Unfortunately, this therapy requires lengthy periods of administration and is often associated with severe and adverse events. Furthermore, this drug has limited efficacy and the sustained virological response rate is of 40–50% in genotype HCV-1 infected patients, and of 80% in those infected with genotypes 2 and 3 [41, 42].
This emphasizes that new therapies are clearly needed, since for the treatment of this infection, and generally for diseases caused by viruses belonging to the Flaviviridae family, therapeutic strategies really effective and selective are not available.
All of the 12 HCV genotypes, which have nucleotide sequences that differ by as much as 30%, produce a single polyprotein of about 3,000 amino acids, which is subsequently processed by viral and host proteases into four structural proteins and six nonstructural proteins (altogether 10 mature proteins). As summarized in Figure 2, the structural proteins (S proteins: core, E1, E2, and p7) generate the viral capsid and envelope proteins and are cleaved by host-signal peptidases, while the six nonstructural proteins (NS proteins: NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B) are responsible for genome replication and are largely generated by HCV-encoded protease .
Figure 2: Simplified representation of structure of Hepacivirus and Flaviviruses polyprotein.
HCV Helicase is part of the bi-functional NS3 protein, carrying three different enzymatic activities: helicase, NTPase, and serine protease activities.
NS3 helicase is essential for viral replication, and this makes it one of the most promising target for the antiviral therapy.
The known HCV helicase inhibitors can be classified on the base of their mechanism of action, into the first four groups of those above cited:(1)inhibitors of NTPase activity by interference with NTP binding, (2)inhibitors of NTPase activity by allosteric mechanism,(3)competitive inhibitors of RNA binding,(4)inhibitors of the coupling of NTP hydrolysis at the unwinding reaction.
3.1. Inhibition of NTPase Activity by Interference with NTP Binding
The hydrolysis of ATP supplies the energy that allows the helicase to adopt various nucleotide ligation states that allosterically cause conformational changes in the nucleic acid binding site to drive the movement of the helicase along the length of the nucleic acid chain . So, competitive NTPase inhibitors may lead to decreased ATPase activity and therefore to reduction of the unwinding rate.
Consequently, non-(or slowly) hydrolysable ATP-analogs seemed to be effective tools for inhibiting the helicase activity, like adenosine-5′γ-thiotriphosphate (ATP-γ-S), which is used to determine a low level of unwinding of HCV dsRNA [44, 45]. However, ribavirin 5′-triphosphate (RTP), that inhibits the HCV NTPase/helicase by a competitive mechanism in regard to ATP , and ribavirin 5′-diphosphate (RDP), both reported in Figure 3, even showing IC50 values in the micromolar range, demonstrates to determine only a weakly enzymatic inhibition . The same behavior has been put in evidence for paclitaxel, compound structurally nonrelated to NTP. This derivative is able to block the NTP-binding site (IC50 = 22 μM) and to inhibit the ATPase activity (IC50 = 17 μM) in a competitive way, but is not able to inhibit the helicase activity at concentration lower than 1 mM 
Figure 3: Structure of three competitive HCV helicase inhibitors ribavirin 5′-triphosphate (1), ribavirin 5′-diphosphate (2), and paclitaxel (3).
The partial unwinding activity mediated by these competitive NTPase inhibitors is common to all members of the class, and the concentrations needed for the helicase inhibition usually exceed the IC50 value by 3–5 times. At these concentrations, the NTPase activity reached 10–35% of the control [46–48]. The basis for the phenomenon remains unclear.
On the other hand, most potent benzotriazole helicase inhibitors were identified during the course of a random screening study [49, 50]. In particular, 4, 5, 6, 7-tetrabromobenzotriazole (TBBT) (4), known as a potent and highly selective inhibitor of protein kinase 2, and 5,6-dichloro-1-(β-D-ribofuranosyl) benzotriazole (DRBT) (5) displayed IC50 values of 20 and 1.5 μM, respectively (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Structure of the halogenated benzotriazoles TBBT (4) and DRBT (5).
On the contrary, the corresponding imidazole derivative of DRBT, the 5, 6-dichloro-1-(β-D-ribofuranosyl) benzimidazole (DRBI), against NTPase/helicase of a large number of members of the Flaviviridae family (HCV, WNV, DENV, and JEV) resulted to be completely inactive.
To explain this finding, Bretner et al. synthesized and studied a new series of substituted (alkyl, hydroxy alkyl, chloro alkyl, ribofuranose) 1H-benzimidazole and 1H-benzotriazole derivatives shown in Figures 5 and 6 [50, 51].
Figure 5: Synthesis of TBBT (4) and its N-alkyl derivatives.
Figure 6: Synthesis of 4, 5, 6, 7-tetrabromo 1H-benzimidazole.
TBBT (more less DRBT) resulted effective in HCV subgenomic replicon system in a comparable way to the inhibition reported in the enzymatic essays, showing a property that has been detected only for a handful group of HCV inhibitors .
It has been reported that the starting compounds 1H-benzotriazole (6) and 1H-benzimidazole (17), screened for their effect against the HCV-helicase, showed(i)very low activity (IC50 200 μM and 500 μM, respectively) when measured with a DNA substrate,(ii)no activity when measured either with an RNA substrate or against the flavivirus enzymes of WNV, DENV, and JEV (IC50> 500 μM).
On the contrary, the whole halogenation of 1H-benzotriazole (6) with bromine atoms, to afford the above cited 4, caused either a 10-fold or 9-fold more effective inhibition of the HCV helicase when determined with a DNA substrate or an RNA substrate, respectively, and of 25-fold in the case of the JEV enzyme (IC50 20 μM).
The corresponding bromination of 1H-benzimidazole (17) afforded the derivative (18), which resulted to be less effective than 4 and 2–2.5 times more potent than parent 17 against HCV helicase.
When 1- or 2-alkyl benzotriazoles were screened for their effect on the HCV-helicase activity using the DNA substrate, the 2-alkylated derivatives (10–12) resulted to be significantly more potent inhibitors of the enzyme (2- to 7- times) than the respective 1-alkylated analogues (7–9).
On the other hand, enhancement of the activity was observed when the aliphatic chain was elongated in both 1-alkylated benzotriazoles (7–9) and 1-alkylated benzimidazoles (19–21) than the respective 2-alkylated analogues. In the case of the benzimidazole derivatives (19–21), however, the inhibitory activity was very low and ranged between 250 and 500 μM. Furthermore, the HCV helicase activity of the alkylated benzimidazoles tested using the RNA substrate, as well as using other viral NTPase/helicases, displayed no inhibitory activity.
This behaviour suggests that these inhibitors do not act by blocking the NTP binding sites of the enzymes and that occupation of an allosteric nucleoside binding site should be considered, as previously suggested by Porter .
Furthermore, in this study the authors observed that replacement of the alkyl side-chain by a substituent endowed with higher hydrophilicity (hydroxyethyl derivatives 13 and 14 in Figure 5) or with higher hydrophobicity (chloroethyl derivatives 15 and 16 in Figure 5) dramatically decreases the activity of the tetrabromobenzotriazoles. Consequently, it seems that a small hydrophobic alkyl moiety (methyl or ethyl) at position 2- of the tetrabromobenzotriazole could play a crucial role in the inhibition of the HCV NTPase/helicase.
Introduction of a ribofuranosyl ring in both benzotriazole and tetrabromobenzotriazole improves the water solubility but leads to a decrease of the inhibitory activity against HCV and all the enzymes tested. The same substituent in the position 1 of the 5,6-dichlorobenzotriazole DRBT (5) was, as above reported, very effective in inhibiting the HCV and WNV helicases (IC50 1.5 μM and 3.0 μM, respectively) but ineffective against JEV helicase . On the contrary, replacement of chlorine atoms of the benzotriazole ring with either bromine atoms or methyl groups (compounds 28–30, Figure 7) showed lower activity compared to DRBT.
Figure 7: Synthesis of compounds 5, 27–30.
In an extension of this study, an additional class of nucleoside analogues known as ring-expanded nucleosides (REN or “fat”) involving 6-aminoimidazo [4,5-e] [1, 3] diazepine-4,8-dione ring were reported to be active against the helicase unwinding reaction . A number of RENs, such as compounds 31 and 32 of Figure 8, displayed IC50 values in the micromolar range. In view of the observed tight complex between some nucleosides and RNA and/or DNA substrates of a helicase, the mechanism of REN action might involve binding to the minor or major groove of the helical nucleic acid substrate.
Figure 8: Structures of the ring expanded nucleosides 31 and 32.
The fat nucleosides 31, 32, and TBBT (4) and nogalamycin (see compound 76) have been recently used to construct a pharmacophore model for designing new Japanese encephalitis virus NS3 helicase/NTPase inhibitors, using a refined structure of this enzyme .
On the other hand, the REN 5′-triphosphates, such as compounds 33 and 34 of Figure 9, did not influence the unwinding reaction while exerting their inhibitory effect (IC50 0.55 μM and 1.5 μM, respectively) on the ATPase activity of the enzyme. As reported in Figure 9, compounds 33 and 34, containing the 5 : 7-fused heterocyclic systems, imidazo [4,5-e] [1, 3] diazepine and imidazo [4,5-e] [1, 2, 4] triazepine, respectively, were synthesized from the corresponding nucleosides 36 and 37, employing the Ludwig’s procedure . The nucleosides 36 and 37, in turn, were synthesized by Vorbrüggen ribosylation [57–60] of the respective heterocycles 35 and 38 [61, 62].
Figure 9: Synthesis of compounds 33 and 34.
Therefore, in exploring the potential anti-Flaviviridae activity of the ring system contained in 31, the same authors focused on different substituents (alkyl, arylalkyl, and aromatic groups) at position 6, along with variations of sugar moieties at position 1 (ribose, 2′-deoxyribose, or acyclic derivatives) as well as their attachment to the base (α or β configuration) .
The general method for the synthesis of the designed nucleosides (41–59) was involved, as reported in Figure 10, the Vorbrüggen ribosylation [53, 54] of dimethyl imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylate (39) [64, 65], followed by condensation of the resulting imidazole nucleoside (40) with the appropriately substituted guanidine derivatives.
Figure 10: Synthesis of the compounds 41–59.
The modulation effect exerted by RENs can result in an inhibition or activation. In the first case, the mechanism may involve the interaction of RENs with a DNA or an RNA substrate through binding to the major or minor groove of the double-helix. In the case of activation, the mechanism may involve an allosteric binding site that can be occupied by nucleoside/nucleotide-type molecules including, but not limited to RENs. The occupation of this allosteric site on the enzyme is dependent upon the high level of ATP (NTP) concentration in the reaction mixture.
RENs obtained with the above procedures were screened for inhibition of NTPase/helicase of the WNV. One of the most promising among these early inhibitors is 1-(2′-O-methyl-β-D-ribofuranosyl)imidazo[4,5-d]pyridazine-4,7(5H,6H)-dione (HMC-HO4) (60), Figure 11, which produces a promising antiviral effect (EC50 = 25–30 μM) . At all the concentrations of HMC-HO4, ATP hydrolysis is stimulated, suggesting that the inhibitor somehow uncouples the ATPase and helicase functions. In that regard, RENs may represent a starting point for the development of highly selective inhibitors of WNV NTPase/helicase.
Figure 11: Chemical structure of 1-(2′-O-Methyl-β-D-ribofuranosyl)imidazo[4,5-d]pyridazine-4, 7(5H, 6H)-dione (HMC-HO4) (60).
An other recent starting point is represented by triphenylmethane derivatives, as reported from Chen et al. . Compound (61) of Figure 12, where the triphenylmethane moiety is linked to a 2-(3-bromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)propane, was identified as a good inhibitor that suppresses HCV RNA replication in the HCV replicon cells through both the inhibition of ATP hydrolysis and the RNA substrate binding .
Figure 12: Chemical structure of 4, 4′-(1-(4-(2-(3-bromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)propan-2-yl)phenyl)ethane-1,1-diyl)bis(2-bromophenol) (61).
3.2. Inhibition of NTPase Activity by Allosteric Mechanisms
The partial inhibition mediated by the competitive NTPase inhibitors may be avoided by utilizing compounds chemically unrelated to NTP, which reduce the accessibility to the NTP-binding site in a noncompetitive manner . An example is the calmodulin antagonist trifluoperazine (62, Figure 13). Although the molecule is known to interact with domain 1 of HCV helicase, it is uncertain if inhibition results from conformational changes or from blockage of the ATP-binding site .
Figure 13: Structure of the calmodulin antagonist trifluoperazine (62).
Even some tropolones have been screened as inhibitors of HCV helicase-catalyzed DNA unwinding. Recently Bernatowicz et al. have described several derivatives bearing a side chain that connect the seven-member ring system to some N-heterocycles.
The most active compound, 3,5,7-tri[(40-methylpiperazin-10-yl)methyl]tropolone (63), inhibited RNA replication by 50% at 46.9 μM (EC50), showing an IC50 = 3.4 μM and a CC50> 1000 μM (SI > 21), whereas the most efficient was 3,5,7-tri[(30-methylpiperidin-10-yl)methyl]tropolone (64), with an EC50 of 35.6 μM, which unfortunately exhibited a lower SI (9.8) derived by a CC50 = 348 μM. These tropolone derivatives, reported in Figure 14, are the first antihelicase compounds that inhibit HCV replication with the ability to cause the appearance of resistant mutants, suggesting that inhibition of replication is the result of inhibition of the enzyme activity. They also inhibit replication of the HCV subgenomic replicon in cell cultures .
Figure 14: Structure and synthesis of the compounds 63 and 64.
3.3. Competitive Inhibition of RNA Binding
Several polynucleotides displayed inhibitory HCV helicase activity. The inhibition is believed to result from the competition of the polynucleotides with DNA or RNA substrates, an effect that could be mimicked by synthetic macromolecules .
With the aim of discovering new anti-HCV agents, ViroPharma synthesized several benzimidazole derivatives, two of them (compounds 65 and 66, Figure 15) showing high activity against HCV helicase . Although the exact mechanism of 65 and 66 is still not clear, they might compete with nucleic acids in the manner above mentioned. In particular, the benzene ring and the NH group could interact by hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bound, respectively.
Figure 15: The HCV helicase inhibitors reported by ViroPharma Inc.
In the attempt to extend the SAR analysis, some new dimers containing benzimidazole, benzoxazole, pyridinoxazole, and benzothiazole rings, attached to symmetrical linkers, were synthesized by Phoon et al., as summarized in Figure 16 [70, 71]. Preliminary studies of these compounds showed a significant decrease in potency when the benzimidazole moiety was replaced by the benzoxazole or benzothiazole rings (compounds 67). On the other hand, the aminobenzimidazole-diamides (68) and aminophenyl benzimidazole-diureas (69) derivatives displayed, at 25 μg/mL, 6–13, and 20–28 percent inhibitory activity, respectively.
Figure 16: Structures of diamides (67), aminobenzimidazole-derived diamides (68), and two aminophenyl benzimidazole-derived diureas (69).
Likewise, the linker was also implicated in the inhibitory activity since replacement of the diamide linkage possessed by 65 with the diurea linkage (compounds 69) led to reduced potency. Thus, the SAR data indicate that the benzimidazole ring, the benzene group at the C2 position of the benzimidazole moiety, and the nature of the linker are essential for the activity .
The synthesis of these analogues is outlined in Figure 17. Aminophenols and thiophenols, or the corresponding pyridine derivatives, reacted easily with p-aminobenzoic acid in the presence of polyphosphoric acid to afford the corresponding oxazole and thiazole derivatives (72). Subsequent coupling of 72 and 2-aminobenzoimidazole with the opportune acid dichlorides furnished the products 67–69.
Figure 17: Synthesis of the diamides (67), aminobenzimidazole-derived diureas (68), and aminophenyl benzimidazole-derived diamides (69).
Belon et al. recently described how a prototype in the symmetrical benzimidazolephenyl series, the N1,N4-bis[4-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)phenyl]benzene-1,4-dicarboxamide (BIP)2B, (69a, derivative of 69 with Y = phenyl, Figure 18), binds directly the HCV NS3 helicase in the same binding site for RNA in a competitive manner. Furthermore, they reported that 69a interacts with NS3 encoded non only by various HCV genotypes, but even by Dengue virus (DV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) and, even if less tightly, the related human helicase .
Figure 18: Symmetrical benzimidazolephenylcarboxamide (BIP)2B.
Also small peptides specifically inhibit HCV helicases, even in cells bearing HCV replicon. Between them, a peptide expressed in bacteria, composed of 14 amino acids (p14, RRGRTGRGRRGIYR), demonstrated to be the best enzyme inhibitor. P14 has the same amino-acidic sequence as that surrounding the putative HCV helicase arginine finger and inhibits the replication of HCV replicon in cells with an EC50 = 83 μM , while reduces the DNA unwinding with an IC50 of 0.2 μM .
A new selective inhibitor of the HCV helicase, QU663 (compound 73 of Figure 19), discovered by Maga and coworkers, showed a potent and selective inhibition with Ki of 0.75 μM . The study of the inhibition mechanism has revealed that QU663 is a specific inhibitor of the strand-displacement activity, without affecting the ability of NS3 helicase to hydrolyse ATP. QU663 could function as a competitive inhibitor with respect to nucleic acid substrate by decreasing the affinity of the enzyme for the substrate. Molecular docking studies further support this explanation. Therefore, QU663 inhibits the unwinding activity of NS3 in a competitive manner with respect to the DNA substrate, making it a promising candidate for a novel class of anti-HCV drugs.
Figure 19: Molecular formula of (N′-(pyrazinecarbonyl)-N′′-(7-ethoxy-2-methylquinolin-4-yl)hydrazine) (QU633).
Recently, a new rational approach for the design of selective inhibitors of the HCV NS3 helicase brought the discovery of a novel HCV helicase inhibitor that potentially could compete for the nucleic acid binding site, occupying the NS3/RNA binding cler. In consequence of this de novo drug design, the predicted (E)-methyl 4-((5-(3-oxobut-1-enyl)-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxamido)methyl)benzoate (74, Figure 20) was synthesized and tested in the HCV replicon system. It inhibits HCV replicons with an EC50 of 9 μM, but showing a CC50 = 30 μM .
Figure 20: Molecular structure of compound 74.
3.4. Inhibition of the Unwinding through Intercalation of Polynucleotide Chain
DNA and RNA intercalating compounds are potential helicase inhibitors by increasing the energy required for duplex/intercalator complex unwinding [77–79].
In particular, two anthracycline derivatives, doxorubicin and nogalamycin (compounds 75 and 76, Figure 21), have been shown to be effective inhibitors of the unwinding reaction . The limits in their application for the treatment of chronic viral infections is their high cytotoxicity and weak penetration into the cell. Thus, if intercalative modulation of the DNA or RNA substrates is to be considered as a possible antiviral therapy, less toxic and more selective derivatives must be identified.
Figure 21: Structures of two DNA/RNA intercalators doxorubicin (75) and nogalamycin (76) that have displayed inhibition of the unwinding reaction catalyzed by HCV helicase.
As previously seen, the antibiotic nogalamycin (76), that interacts with allosteric binding site, has been recently used to obtain a structure-based pharmacophore model for JEV NS3 helicase/NTPase .
In the aim to find less toxic compounds, a large group of amidinoanthracyclines, with decreased acute toxicity and cardiotoxicity compared to the parent antibiotics, were screened against HCV helicase. From this studies emerged one of the most potent and selective inhibitors of helicase activity described in the literature. The derivative 77, showed in Figure 22, acts not only via intercalation into the double-stranded DNA substrate, but also impeding formation of the active helicase complex via competition with the enzyme for access to the substrate. Tested in the subgenomic HCV replicon system, 77 it showed an EC50 of 0.13 μM and a CC50 = 4.3 μM .
Figure 22: Structural formula of amidinoanthracycline derivative 77.
An other class of compounds that probably acts via intercalation into double-stranded nucleic acids with strong specificity for RNA are the acridone derivatives, but a direct interaction with the viral NS3 helicase cannot be excluded. A large group of acridones were tested from Stankiewicz-Drogon et al. using the direct fluorometric helicase activity assay to determine their inhibitory properties towards the NS3 helicase of HCV. From a preliminary study, N-(pyridin-4-yl)-amide (78) and N-(pyridin-2-yl)-amide (79) of acridone-4-carboxylic acid emerged to be efficient RNA replication inhibitors with a good specificity in subgenomic replicon system and low cytotoxicity (Figure 23) . Even the thiazolpiperazinyl acridone derivative 80 demonstrated to act as a potent agent against HCV replicons (EC50 = 3 μM) and as a selective inhibitor of the HCV NS3 helicase, albeit with low potency (IC50 = 110 μM) . Comparing acridone derivatives 78 and 79 with 80, we can see that the amide bonding formed after the derivatization of acridone-4-carboxylic acid with amines seemed to increase affinity and selectivity for the NS3 enzyme .
Figure 23: Structures and activity of acridone-4-carboxylic acid derivatives 78 and 79 and of 7-amino-1,3,10-trimethoxy-6-(4-(thiazol-2-yl)piperazin-1-yl)acridin-9(10H)-one 80.
Finally, with the intent to improve the antiviral activity of acridones, Stankiewicz-Drogon et al. prepared a new class of compounds, namely, 5-methoxyacridone-4-carboxylic acids (MACA). From this group, compound 81 (Figure 24) came out not only as an efficient inhibitor of the NS3 helicase in the in vitro assay but also as a potent inhibitor of HCV replication endowed with low cytotoxicity for human hepatoma cells .
Figure 24: Structures of 2-fluoro-5-methoxy-9-oxo-N-(pyridin-3-yl)- -9, 10-dihydroacridine-4-carboxamide (81).
An enveloped single-stranded positive-sense RNA (ssRNA+) virus, SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), has been recently identified as the etiological agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in humans [84–88]. About ten thousand cases of SARS worldwide, including 800 deaths, were reported in 2003 (WHO data). Although this initial global outbreak, SARS appears to has been successfully contained, but it remains a serious concern because no vaccine or effective drug treatment is actually available. Recently, Tanner and coworkers have found that Bananin and three of their derivatives, Figure 25, function as non-competitive SARS-CoV helicase inhibitors (with IC50 values in the micromolar range) at a site different from the ATP and nucleic acid binding site, causing inhibition probably through an allosteric mechanism . In foetal rhesus kidney-4cells infected with SARS-Cov, Bananin inhibited the viral replication (IC50= 10 μM) with low host cellular toxicity (CC50= 390 μM) .
Figure 25: Molecular formula of Bananin (BAN) (82), Iodobananin (IBN) (83), Vanillinbananin (VBN) (84), Eubananin (EUB) (85).
Finally, in the last years various molecules have been detected showing an interesting and promising anti-Coronaviridae activity. Unfortunately, for many of them, was not identified a clear molecular target or mechanism of action. The fact remains that the eventual target could be the NS3 helicase. With this in mind, we report briefly the new classes of compounds that have emerged in recent published works. Among them glycopeptide antibiotics , which seem to interfere with the Coronavirus entry process but do not exclude an unknown cellular target; pyridine N-oxide derivatives ; plant lectins , which most probably interfere with the glycans on the spike protein during virus entry and virus release; phenanthroindolizines and phenanthroquinolizidines ; tetrahydroquinoline oxocarbazate derivatives as inhibitor of human cathepsin L and as entry blockers .
Picornaviridae family includes 9 genera, 3 of which are human pathogens: Enterovirus (containing poliovirus, enterovirus, coxsackievirus, echovirus), Rhinovirus (approximately 105 serotypes), and Hepatovirus (Hepatitis A virus). At present no specific antiviral therapy is available for the treatment of Picornaviridae infections. The viruses belonging to this family, all having a single-stranded positive-sense RNA (ssRNA+) genome, cause a dramatic variety of illnesses, including meningitis, colds, heart infection, conjunctivitis, and hepatitis.
Recently Carta and coworkers reported the synthesis and antiviral screening of a series of N-[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamides (86(1-yl), 87(2-yl)  and N,N′-bis-[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkyldicarboxamides (88(1-yl), 89(2-yl))  (see Figure 26).
Figure 26: Molecular formula of novel N-[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamides (86–87) and N,N′-bis-[4-4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamides (88–89).
Compounds were evaluated in vitro for cytotoxicity and antiviral activity against a wide spectrum of ssRNA+ viruses, like Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV), Yellow Fever Virus (YFV), Coxsakie Virus B (CVB-2), Polio Virus (Sb-1), and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1). Only CVB-2 and Sb-1 were inhibited by N-[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamide derivatives. In particular, two of them emerged for their selectivity: 87e, which was the most active against CVB-2 (EC50 = 10 μM and CC50 > 100 μM) and 86h, which was the most active against Sb-1 (EC50 = 30 μM and CC50 = 90 μM), Figure 27 . N-[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamides (86a–e,g,h and 87a–g) were prepared by condensation of the amino derivatives 90, 91 with the appropriate anhydrides 92 under stirring at 100°C for 2 h, as shown in Figure 28. The N,N′-bis[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkyldicarboxamides (88a–d, g, h and 88a–d89a–g, i–k) were in turn prepared, as reported in Figure 29, by condensation of the amines 1(2)-(4-aminophenyl)benzotriazoles (90, 91) with the suitable diacyl dichlorides (93).
Figure 27: Molecular formula of compounds 86h and 87e.
Figure 28: Synthesis of N-[4-1H(2H)-benzotriaol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamides (86 and 87).
Figure 29: Synthesis of N,N′-bis[4-1H(2H)-benzotriaol-1(2)- yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamides 88a–d, g, h and 89a–g, i–k.
Among N,N′-bis-[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkyldicarboxamides, the bis-5,6-dimethyl-derivatives (89d–f) exhibited good activity against Enteroviruses (EC50 were 7–11 μM against CVB-2 and 19–52 μM against Sb-1) and the bis-5,6-dichloro-benzotriazol-2-yl derivatives (80i–k) showed very selective activity against CVB-2 (EC50 = 4–11 μM) resulting to be completely inactive against all the other viruses screened .
N-[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamides (86 and 87) were evaluated in silico against the 3D model of the Sb-1 helicase, as exemplified by compounds 86h (a) and 89f (b) in Figure 30. The portion of the enzyme containing the binding site interacting with the inhibitors consists of two loops, part of two β-sheets, and part of three helices.
Figure 30: Binding of compounds 86h (a) and 89f (b) to the putative binding site on the surface of Polio (Sb-1) helicase.
It is important to notice that, with respect to the N-[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkylcarboxamide series, all the N,N′-bis[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]alkyldicarboxamide derivatives bind helicase Sb-1 in a different manner, as expected, due to their different shapes and dimensions. This is well quantified by the value of the solvent accessible volume of this new class of inhibitors, which on average has almost doubled compared to that of the previous molecular series (e.g., 1672 Å3 versus 891 Å3, resp.). Accordingly, it is impossible for the protein pocket to host N,N′-bis[4-(1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl) phenyl]alkyldicarboxamides with the same binding mode, and the results form the docking study reveal that only one of the two identical inhibitors moieties can be positioned well within the binding pocket. However, in correspondence of the most favored binding mode for the most active compounds, the formation of a new, small network of H-bonds between 89f and enzyme was observed. In particular, the analysis of the trajectories of the MD simulations for the 89f/helicase complex as an example indicates that there is a constant presence of an H-bond which involves the carbonyl oxygen atom of the Asn179 side chain and the triazole N(1) atom of the drug, characterized by an average dynamic length (ADL) of 3.0 Å. At the same time, it is possible to verify the formation of other two H-bond interactions, the former between the C=O backbone group of Ser221 and the NH group of the amidic moiety of 89f (ADL 1.6 Å), and the latter between the carbonyl oxygen atom of the C=O group of the same amidic moiety of 89f and the side chain hydroxyl group of Ser221 (ADL = 2.6 Å).
Compounds 89i–k also exhibited selectivity against Coxsackie B2CVB-2. Unfortunately, homology standard techniques were not able to produce a reliable 3D model for the CVB-2 virus helicase, due to very low sequence identities found during alignment processes.
In the absence of a 3D model for the CVB-2 helicase, the activity of 89i–k can be explained adopting a 2D alignment analysis.
The putative binding site proposed by Carta and coworkers for Sb-1 is composed by 30 residues and, according to their 2D alignment, the binding site for CVB-2 differs for 7 residues only. Among these, Ser296 in Sb-1 is mutated to Arg237 in CBV-2. Following their analysis, and a preliminary visual inspection based on the swapping of Ser to Arg in the Polio helicase, they concluded that this is the most important residue in the case of compounds 89i–k, featuring chlorine atoms as substituents. In fact, the positively charged side chain of Arg237 is placed at an average distance of 3.5 Å from the Cl atoms, thus sensibly resulting is strong electrostatic interactions between the inhibitor and the protein. These speculations, which may account in part for the selectivity of these compounds with respect to CVB-2, clearly await further confirmation from the simulations performed on the corresponding protein 3D models.