Against Evolution Essay

Impossible Evolution

Refuting evolution doesn’t require complicated equations or lab experiments—though those do the job, too. Just remember the two fundamental flaws we can use to show evolution to be not even scientifically viable.

The Evolution Worldview

Evolutionists may never be persuaded by evidence alone, since they interpret the evidence according to their worldview. But by challenging their worldview, you can show that their assumptions—from logic to absolute morality to uniformity—are actually resting on biblical ground.

Cosmological Evidence

The declared purpose of cosmology is to understand the structure, operation, and origin of the universe and the earth only “in the framework of natural laws.” This restriction precludes the planning and purposeful acts of a Creator God. Many scientific objections can be raised against the above model.

Need More Evidence?

If we depend on evidences outside the Bible to strengthen our faith, we can be shaken every time another argument comes along that seems to undermine the Bible. We need to make sure our trust rests in the God who gave us Scripture, not human arguments that question His Word.

Evidence Against Evolution Topics

  • Evidence for Creation

    Creation overflows with evidence that points toward the Creator God. The design and complexity of life loudly declare, “There is a God!”

  • Probability of Evolution

    Mathematical and probability calculations powerfully demonstrate the impossibility of biological evolution to produce the diversity and complexity of life.

Articles About Evidence Against Evolution

  • Evolution? Impossible!

    Evolution is often upheld as proven fact. This is far from the truth! Two simple arguments from observational science demonstrate that evolution is impossible.

  • March 9, 2018

    Consistent with the young-earth creation explanation for the origin of species, the scientific community recently observed the formation of a new bird species in real time. But how did this new species form? In a manner consistent with evolution? Or with YEC?

  • March 1, 2018

    The progress of science over the last 150 years has not only rebutted Darwin’s central arguments for evolution; it has also replaced them with an entirely different scientific explanation for the origin of species. Recent research on Darwin’s finches has confirmed this bold pronouncement.

  • Magazine Department Article

    The Race to Seven Billion

    April 1, 2012 from Answers Magazine

    Late last year the planet welcomed its seven billionth living resident, according to estimates by the United Nations.

  • Magazine Department Article

    Embryos Disprove Evolution

    Sept. 15, 2008 from Answers Magazine

    Last year in China, geologists discovered fossilized animal embryos, which evolutionists believe to be 600 million years old.

  • Taming of the Shrew['s Tree]

    June 23, 2007

    Opposing the date of 140–80 million years old that some scientists ascribe to our (supposed) oldest mammalian ancestors, Wible, et al., conclude, based on an analysis of a shrewlike fossil, that mammals evolved “only” 65 million years ago.

  • Something Fishy About Gill Slits!

    March 14, 2007

    A National Geographic photo-essay showing the diversity of ocean-dwelling worms resurrected a piece of scientific misinformation that should have died long ago.

  • Alligators Could Fly?

    Dec. 23, 2006

    Articles like the one discussed may leave evolutionists puzzled even while creationists chuckle.

  • An Examination of Error

    May 26, 2006, pp. 30–32

    What should one call it if pupils are taught something which is factually incorrect? Whose fault is it if pupils pick up factually incorrect information?

  • TechnicalResearch Paper

    Shining Light on the Evolution of Photosynthesis

    Dec. 1, 2003, pp. 74–84

    Biochemical sequences necessary for the evolution of photosynthesis would have required the evolution of a set of sophisticated enzymes that generated a series of useless intermediates.

  • Deep Layers

    Oct. 26, 2002

    On Saturday, 26 October, the World War II fighter plane Glacier Girl is expected to fly again.

  • “A New Beginning”

    May 3, 1998

    The good news this month is the appearance of Michael Behe’s book, Darwin’s Black Box, published by the Free Press.

  • Magazine Article

    A “165 Million Year” Surprise

    March 1, 1997, pp. 14–15

    A “mysterious network” of mud springs on the edge of the ‘market town’ of Wootton Bassett, near Swindon, Wiltshire, England, has yielded a remarkable surprise.

  • Magazine Article

    How to Read an Evolutionary Family Tree

    June 1, 1996, pp. 52–53

    The dotted lines on evolutionary family trees reinforce the fact that there is no evidence to prove the existence of common ancestors for the animals shown.

  • Magazine Article

    Reflections on the Emperor’s New Clothes

    Sept. 1, 1995, pp. 35–37

    People who have great confidence in their own enlightenment and the inherent ability of man to solve the problems of humanity without divine aid are also vulnerable to pride and self-deception.

  • Magazine Article

    What’s Happened to the Horse?

    Sept. 1, 1995, pp. 14–16

    'How can the Bible be true if life has evolved over millions of years? Evolution is a fact. Look what's happened to the horse.'

  • Magazine Article

    Evolution 'Unscientific'

    June 1, 1995, pp. 28–30

    Q:Dr Norman, what is the specific biomedical research area in which you have been labelled a groundbreaking pioneer?

  • Magazine Article

    Railroad Wants Monkey off its Back

    Sept. 1, 1994, pp. 20–22

    Contrary to 45 years of common teaching,4 physical training instructor David W. Apts, author of The Back Book, coaches students to lift with their back muscles.

  • Magazine Article

    The Strange Case of the Yum Yum Dog

    Sept. 1, 1994, pp. 35–36

    he fabrication of a dog ancestor of the whales with a pre-recorded 'growl, growl, yum, yum, yum' voice, all from a supposed single tooth, was more than I could swallow.

  • Magazine Article

    People Were Always People!

    Sept. 1, 1993, pp. 19–20

    According to evolutionists, Homo erectus was a separate species which evolved into Homo sapiens—even though the theory has been embarrassed by the finding of erectus and sapiens fossils.

  • Magazine Article

    Mega Problems for Bat Evolution

    Sept. 1, 1992, pp. 50–51

    Say ‘bats’ and most people think of what are known as microbats—the echo-locating, usually insect-eating types. But there are also larger megabats, such as the fruit bats.

  • Magazine Article

    The 'Oldest Known Fly'—A Lesson in Caution

    June 1, 1992, pp. 6–7

    Evolutionists generally believe that insects with two wings have evolved from the ‘more primitive’ or ‘unspecialized’ four-winged condition.

Argument Against Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution Essay

1192 Words5 Pages

Charles Darwin proposed the theory of evolution to explain the origin, diversity and complexity of life. I will will disprove evolution by showing that natural selection only explains small evolutionary changes, collectively known as microevolution. Natural selection cannot drive large evolutionary changes, macroevolution. I will also show that the primordial soup, in which life supposedly evolved, did not exist.

Neo-Darwinism incorporates the discoveries of modern science into Darwin's original theory while leaving the basic beliefs intact. Darwin proposed that individuals with favorable traits are more likely to survive and reproduce. Darwin called this process natural selection. Darwin did not understand how or why variation…show more content…

Natural selection forces animals and plants to adapt. Microevolution happens, and it has been observed in numerous scientific experiments.

The real question is not whether or not microevolution happens. It does, but can microevolution be extended to explain large evolutionary changes? Such changes require new genes.

Natural selection only optimizes existing genes: If a gene does not exist, it cannot provide a selective advantage. Natural selection only operates on existing genes.

When an existing gene tries to evolve into a new gene, the evolving gene must provide some selective advantage, before natural selection can drive the transition. (The declaration of many evolutionists that natural selection drives the transition every step of the way, implies that the evolving gene must perform its new function before it evolves into the new gene. This is like saying a bird with no wings can fly.)

Random chance not natural selection is responsible for the evolution of new genes. Until an evolving gene offers some competitive advantage, natural selection is out of the picture.

If evolution is not a viable theory, then why is it generally accepted by modern science and why is it often taught as a proven fact in high school and college?

To answer this question, let us take a trip back in time to the late
1800's. Darwin observed birds on the Galapagos islands over 100 years ago, and the variation that he

Show More

Categories: 1

0 Replies to “Against Evolution Essay”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *